Bio2Bedside

NAYA Therapeutics – Pioneering Precision Therapeutics for Liver Cancer

NAYA Therapeutics

Naya Therapeutics is a US-based biotech developing NK cell engagers and targeted alpha radiopharmaceuticals to treat hepatocellular carcinoma and other solid tumors.

NAYA Tx: Episode Overview

Check out our episode overview to see how NAYA Therapeutics is harnessing NK cell engagers and Astatine-211 radiopharmaceuticals to address the urgent unmet need in liver cancer.

Episode Highlights: Featuring CEO & Founder Daniel Teper & Professor Yaron Ilan

B2B Brief: NAYA Therapeutics

Naya Therapeutics focuses on patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who fail to respond to checkpoint inhibitors or chemotherapy. The company is advancing a dual-modality strategy: NK cell engagers to restore innate immune function and alpha radiopharmaceuticals to eradicate residual disease. 

This approach directly addresses the limitations of current HCC therapies, where response rates remain below 30%.

Led by Daniel Teper, PharmD, MBA (Chairman & CEO), Naya’s leadership team brings significant experience in oncology innovation, financing, and commercialization. Executives include Michael G. King (EVP), Raquel Cabo (COO), Lyn Falconio (CCO), Dan Chiche, MD (CMO), Vidisha Mohad, PhD (Head of Product Development), and Ravi Kiron, PhD, MBA (CBO). The board and advisors feature veterans from Sanofi, Amgen, Pfizer, and venture firms .

Naya’s clinical program is guided by Prof. Yaron Ilan (featured in this episode), a hepatology leader and former President of the Israeli Liver Association, with decades of experience in liver cancer and chronic liver disease.

Naya’s NK cell engager platform leverages NKp46 activation to restore functionality in exhausted NK cells and redirect them against GPC3-expressing tumors, the dominant biomarker in HCC.

In parallel, its radiopharmaceutical platform employs antibody fragments conjugated with astatine-211 (At-211), an alpha-emitter with a short half-life, simple decay chain, and covalent binding chemistry, enabling high tumor penetration and outpatient administration.

The lead NK cell engager will enter Phase 1 clinical testing in checkpoint inhibitor non-responders in HCC

The radiopharmaceutical program aims to establish proof-of-concept in minimal residual disease settings, with potential expansion to other solid tumors. 

Together, the two modalities are designed to raise HCC response rates well above current standards, with global relevance given rising HCC incidence.

Due Diligence

This is different:

Unlike T-cell therapies, which risk collateral damage in cirrhotic livers, NK biology is naturally aligned with liver immunity. The liver harbors a high proportion of NK and NKT cells, making them the frontline defense against malignant transformation.

Naya’s unique patient fit:

Most HCC patients present with advanced disease on a background of cirrhosis or failing livers, where treatment tolerance is low and systemic toxicity is often lethal. Naya’s therapeutics – precise, NK-driven cytotoxicity and short-lived, clean-decay alpha therapy – are designed to minimize collateral liver injury while targeting residual disease.

Naya’s strategic advantage:

By tailoring therapies to the unique physiology and vulnerability of late-stage liver patients, Naya occupies a niche where checkpoint inhibitors and T-cell therapies often fail due to poor response rates or unacceptable toxicity.

Therapeutic:

No clinical proof yet for NAYA’s strategy of NK cell engagers and ²¹¹At radiopharmaceuticals in HCC; efficacy and safety remain to be demonstrated.

Logistical:

Manufacturing bispecifics is complex; ²¹¹At’s short half-life complicates supply/distribution; recruiting post–checkpoint inhibitor HCC patients is challenging.

Regulatory:

First-in-class modalities face uncertain FDA/EMA pathways; heightened CMC/dosimetry scrutiny; reimbursement risks if costs outweigh incremental benefit over existing standards.

NK cell engagers:

Innate Pharma, Dragonfly, and Affimed are developing NK engager platforms, with most programs focused on hematologic malignancies or using CD16 as the engager. Naya differentiates by targeting NKp46, a receptor with stronger and more durable activation, particularly relevant in solid tumors such as HCC.

Targeted alpha therapies (TATs):

Bayer and RayzeBio/BMS are advancing GPC3–Actinium-225 radiopharmaceuticals for HCC, while Novartis and AstraZeneca have made large bets in PSMA and other alpha radioligands. Naya’s advantage is the use of astatine-211, which has a short half-life, a clean single decay path, and outpatient feasibility, addressing many limitations of actinium and lutetium approaches.

But this company is different:

By focusing squarely on HCC biology and aligning modality to setting — NKp46 engagers for refractory tumors and At-211 radiopharma for micro-metastatic disease — Naya avoids the “one-size-fits-all” strategy and positions itself in niches where existing competitors are less well-suited.

NAYA Therapeutics

Founded:

2023

Location:

Miami, FL, USA

Clinical Stage:

Phase I Prep

Status:

post-IPO

Funding to date:

~$15M

Share profile:

Key Speakers

Daniel Teper

Founder and CEO @ NAYA Therapeutics

Prof. Yaron Ilan

Chairman, Medicine, Hadassah Medical Center;

Meet the Hosts

Jeff Martin, PhD

Co-Founder Bio2Bedside

Ben McLeod

Co-Founder Bio2Bedside

Recent Features

Featured Media

No recent media.

Recent News

No recent news.

Job Postings

No job postings at this time.

Neobe Therapeutics: An Introduction

What is Neobe Therapeutics and how did it get started?

Pedro Correia de Sampaio is the co-founder and CEO of Neobe Therapeutics, a UK-based biotech tackling fibrotic barriers in solid tumors that block immune cells and drugs from reaching cancer cells.

With a PhD from Cambridge and a postdoc at MD Anderson, Pedro transitioned from academic cancer research to company-building through Deep Science Ventures. There, he partnered with bacterial engineer Annelise Soulier to develop Neobe’s core strategy: engineering bacteria to break down tumor barriers from within.

The Problem and the Opportunity

Cells, antibodies, and even small molecules have a very difficult time reaching the inner tumor.

Pedro explains that solid tumors aren’t just clumps of cancer cells – they’re embedded in a dense, fibrotic matrix that acts like a fortress, blocking immune cells and therapies from getting in.

This stiff extracellular environment also collapses blood vessels, reducing drug perfusion. As a result, even powerful treatments like CAR-T cells, antibodies, and chemo often fail to reach their targets.

Neobe’s goal is to break down these barriers, soften the tumor, and enable therapies to penetrate more deeply – turning inaccessible, treatment-resistant tumors into ones that can finally respond.

 

Shortcomings of Current Approaches

Degrading ECM in the tumor without causing toxicities has been a major challenge.

Previous attempts to break down the fibrotic “castle walls” of solid tumors – referring to the extracellular matrix (ECM) – have largely failed due to safety issues.

The ECM is a dense, cross-linked mesh of collagens and glycoproteins essential to all healthy tissues. Systemic delivery of ECM-degrading agents led to off-target effects, including cardiac and digestive damage.

Neobe was founded to solve this exact challenge: to break down the ECM only within the tumor, using localized, tumor-activated bacterial delivery, avoiding the collateral damage seen with earlier approaches.

Neobe's Unique Approach

Neobe uses genetically-engineered bacteria to “soften up” solid tumors…

Neobe Therapeutics leverages the natural tendency of bacteria to colonize solid tumors – regions that are hypoxic, nutrient-rich, and immune-privileged.

By engineering commensal-derived bacteria with synthetic biosensors, they create living “bioreactors” that detect the tumor microenvironment and locally secrete ECM-degrading enzymes.

This “Trojan horse” approach allows the bacteria to soften fibrotic tumors from the inside, improving immune cell infiltration and drug access without damaging healthy tissue or triggering systemic side effects.

How is Neobe's Approach Different?

[enter]